That’s a good question. The most likely answer is that a hearing screening, or test, that is done without benefit of a trained hearing specialist is much like trying to self diagnose ones medical problem without the benefit of years of professional training. There are many basic hearing screening tests available online. They generally come with a disclaimer that tells the user that the results should not be considered a substitute for a professionally administered hearing test done under ideal conditions such as with the use of a sound proof, or sound resistant, booth. In addition, a trained technician is needed to interpret the audiogram that is produced. New technology is being introduced that may provide those that wish to take a basic hearing test, but are reluctant (for various reasons) to schedule an appointment with a hearing professional, with another option. With the ability to take a self administered test in various locations other than the office of a hearing professional, the user is presented with the results of the test and the name and contact information of the hearing specialist that has sponsored the availability and use of the testing device. We see numerous opportunities for the use of such a device. Many hearing specialists spend hundreds of hours annually testing individuals that have average or better hearing. They generally do that testing at no cost to the patient. That valuable time is lost and produces no revenue. If the prospective patients with no hearing problems were tested by the use of an unattended device in the waiting room or a convenient neighborhood location, the hearing professional could spend that time with those needing assistance. For more information about remote hearing tests: Contact info@HearingABC.com and reference “Self Testing solutions” Warren Willard, Pres. HearingABC.com